In the picturesque islands of Seychelles, a troubling narrative is unfolding. Recent actions by the current administration suggest a trend of prioritizing profit over preservation, raising concerns among citizens and environmentalists alike. Are we selling our future for immediate gains?
Development is essential, but in a country dependent on its fragile environment, are the right people in power to manage these developments responsibly? Over the past few years, significant new projects have emerged across our islands - Canopy at Anse La Mouche, Cheval Blanc at Intendance, the proposed development at Reef Estate, and now the project on Assomption Island. These developments seem to proceed with little regard for environmental laws, international sanctions, and the concerns of citizens.
One pressing issue is the destruction of the Intendance wetlands, the eradication of the protected terrapin turtles in the area, and the illegal cutting of trees and construction. An illegal wall has even been built right in the turtle nesting ground. This highlights disparities in environmental and planning laws and raises questions about transparency and governance. Despite government promises, the absence of stringent oversight and accountability is evident, especially with ongoing controversies surrounding developments on Seychelles' outer islands, particularly Assomption Island. The delicate ecosystems of our islands are at risk.
While many blame investors for these issues, perhaps our attention should shift to those we have entrusted with safeguarding our resources and making the best decisions for our country. How can we blame investors when they see an opportunity to exploit resources with minimal restrictions and even gain diplomatic power? Who would say no to such a deal?
As a concerned citizen, I question the clear lack of accountability and transparency. Does this remuneration truly prevent corruption, or does it create an environment where personal and national gifts, free helicopter flights for urgent medical attention, and exclusive trips for a select few become the norm?
To my fellow Seychellois and visitors, this is a call to action. It’s not just a bureaucratic oversight; this symbolizes a broader neglect of environmental and social responsibilities. Are you satisfied with the state of our environment and how our precious resources are being exploited for profit by select investors? Is this the development we envisioned? Who is truly calling the shots here, and where are the people we are paying to keep things in check?
As we navigate these challenges, let us reflect on these questions and demand better governance and stewardship of our beloved islands. By raising our voices and holding our leaders accountable, we can work towards a future where development and preservation go hand in hand, ensuring that the natural beauty and resources of Seychelles are safeguarded for generations to come.
With urgency and hope,
Lucie Harter
All the funded NGO’s to preserve Seychelles staying quiet. Sickening.
What I would like to add is the fact that it is kind of absurd that for all these new large development projects, financed and controlled by outside parties, there appear to be constant contraventions of the countries environmental policies.
Based on the Environmental Impact Assessment reports which are then meant to be implemented under an EMMP (Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan) this process is put in the hands of a so called ECO (Environmental Control Officer). These tend to be well paid Seychellois consultants ensuring that the relevant stipulations are adhered to .The fact is that they appear to be on the payroll of the developer but meant to report to the relevant ministries on none compliance and infractions.…